Arizona rancher fails 3-S principle
One of the hallmarks of American liberty is private property rights, or so it used to be. For as long …
Tag Archives: national sovereignty
International fears of America’s demise
For more than two centuries the United States has been a beacon of hope to the rest of the world, …
Overstepping sovereign bounds
The US taxpayer will fund the cleanup of uranium on the sovereign lands of the Navajo and Hopi Indians, according …
Ceding America’s sovereignty through food policy
American sovereignty is probably in no greater danger than now as Congress moves to cede decisions on agricultural production and …
14th Amendment was never intended for this
The original intent of the 14th Amendment was never to grant “anchor baby” or “birthright” status to illegal aliens bent …
Obama’s racial double-standard
Meanwhile, if you listen closely to the Obama Administration you’d think that white folks in Arizona are standing on the street corners of Phoenix and elsewhere in Arizona, dressed in white sheets and burning crosses while calling for the death of all Mexicans. How else can you explain Obama’s lawsuit against the State of Arizona and the idiotic calls by some states and local jurisdictions to boycott Arizona over its passage of a law that merely mirrors federal law? Why are the media playing this up as racist, yet they ignore King Samir Shabazz, the Philadephia Black Panther leader, as he openly calls for the assassination of people simply because of their skin color. Wasn’t the election of Obama supposed to eliminate the racial divide in America? Seems to me that it’s done nothing but create an ever larger chasm with those who share his skin color and political views spurring all of this division. I’d like to hear from the nation’s two biggest race pimps — the Rev. Jesse Jackson and the Rev. Al Sharpton — on this one.
US cedes border region, land to Mexico
This is no longer a matter of politics but a military matter. Congress has the authority and the obligation to immediately declare war on Mexico and allow the US military to secure our southern border as they have been trained. As in war, the purpose of our military being stationed on our border is not to make friends with the enemy combatants and others attempting to infiltrate our country, the purpose is to destroy them on contact.
Protecting liberty: America’s first defense against government
Any government capable of disarming its citizens is not only capable of, but is also very likely preparing for the day when those in power plan to rule by despotism and inflict all sorts of evil on their subjects.
Amazing how little things really changed since 1948
An act of war or simply a news story?
When forces from one country start shooting at uniformed forces from another country is that simply a crime or an act of war? Certainly a uniformed deputy sheriff, operating under the color and authority of the laws affecting his jurisdiction, is an agent of the United States, and as such, those foreign forces firing upon him, whether wearing a uniform or not, should be considered as engaging in war against the United States and therefore treated as such.
